Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
490-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

490-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023399 50.883129)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023357 50.883125,-1.023359 50.883133,-1.023365 50.883141,-1.023374 50.883147,-1.023386 50.883151,-1.023399 50.883152,-1.023412 50.883151,-1.023424 50.883147,-1.023434 50.883141,-1.023440 50.883134,-1.023442 50.883126,-1.023440 50.883117,-1.023434 50.883110,-1.023425 50.883104,-1.023413 50.883100,-1.023400 50.883098,-1.023387 50.883099,-1.023375 50.883103,-1.023365 50.883109,-1.023359 50.883117,-1.023357 50.883125)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL